Arguments for euthanasia

Everyone has the right to decide how they should die. Death is a private matter, and if you are not hurting anyone else, the state should not interfere. Most people would have their pets put down if they were suffering — this would be regarded as kindness.

Arguments for euthanasia

Arguments for voluntary euthanasia 1. Accordingly, democratic societies can make laws to prohibit murder, assault and theft, but should not make laws to prohibit sex before marriage, gay marriage, religious belief, or voluntary euthanasia. This is because people who practise the latter are not harming other people.

The onus is thus on those Arguments for euthanasia to euthanasia to substantiate why voluntary euthanasia is fundamentally flawed. The concept of individualism is fundamental to democratic political theory.

In a democratic society, individualism posits that latitude be given to individuals to behave as they wish, and to develop and satisfy their interests.

To deny a person the right to live his or her life as he or she wishes implies that each individual does not know what is best for himself or herself. That is, only those who are mentally competent, which excludes people with dementia and those with clinical depression while these conditions persistwould be able to make a well-informed decision about voluntary euthanasia.

Individuals can make important decisions about their bodies when Arguments for euthanasia are young, for example, they can choose to participate in dangerous sporting activities.

In many jurisdictions, women can choose to have an abortion. Perversely, as voluntary euthanasia is illegal in most jurisdictions, it would seem that somewhere between the ages of twenty when some women might have an abortion and seventy the age where some may be terminally ill or have a poor quality of life women lose legal control of their bodies.

The clergy, the most vocal opponents of voluntary euthanasia, have imposed their values on other individuals through their strident opposition to a right to die for everybody.

However, they would be unlikely to entertain a reciprocal arrangement that impinged on their individual freedoms. In the spirit of Voltaire, the clergy and other euthanasia opponents most certainly can remonstrate with people requesting euthanasia to change their minds, but they ought not be able to compel them by legislative fiat in a democracy.

Voluntary euthanasia is morally just precisely because it is voluntary. To be denied the right to make this decision is a blight on modern democracy.

In English speaking countries, the euthanasia cause reached legal prominence in the early s. In explaining her situation, she questioned that if she cannot give consent to her own death, then whose body is it?

Sue and Bob reflected what most people think: How could anybody, or any government, deny that simple fact? However, when it comes to public policy, and a choice of what people want for themselves rather than others in the populationpopular support for a policy is a strong political argument in its favour.

The same polls show that voluntary euthanasia is opposed by less than one in six Australians.

Euthanasia

The other is to keep the status quo, but this limits options of a peaceful death to those with the requisite information, capital and means.

Even in unregulated jurisdictions, many such people, including those who are not terminally ill, are already finding a way to achieve a peaceful death. There are several voluntary euthanasia advocacy organisations in Australia.

Legislative reform is the main objective of the state and territory based Dying with Dignity organisations, which do an important job.

Their work is complemented by organisations such as Go Gentle Australia, which was created in to spark a national conversation about voluntary euthanasia laws. That is why so many support him.

People, including mainly elderly people in Australia and overseas, need information on end-of-life drugs now and cannot wait for politicians to legislate for voluntary euthanasia.

It is important to note that committing suicide is legal in most jurisdictions. Perversely, voluntarily gaining assistance with suicide is mostly illegal. Nonetheless, some Australian doctors have admitted to assisting with voluntary euthanasia.

Yet no legal action has been taken against Dr Syme and nor should it be. He acted in the best interests of his patient. Australian doctors have been assisting patients with voluntary euthanasia for many years a survey indicated more than a third of doctors have done soalbeit in an illegal environment.

All this activity is unrefuted, and no serious efforts are being made to stop any of this activity. These matters suggest the following perplexing question. If governments are not intending to prosecute doctors who humanely assist with voluntary euthanasia when it is illegal, why do governments object to its legalisation?

Furthermore, many politicians have objected in the media to Dr Nitschke and other physicians providing information and operating in an unregulated environment.

It would be preferable if politicians regulated voluntary euthanasia, rather than complaining about what is happening in an unregulated environment. The different voluntary euthanasia regulatory systems in many jurisdictions worldwide seem to require that only terminally ill people are eligible.

However, there have been several situations where elderly Australians, who were not terminally ill, committed suicide with the aid of Nembutal.Jun 01,  · A utilitarian argument for euthanasia.

From a utilitarian viewpoint, justifying euthanasia is a question of showing that allowing people to have a good death, at a time of their own choosing, will. Euthanasia is the act of deliberately ending a life to relieve suffering.

Arguments for euthanasia

For example, a doctor who gave a patient with terminal cancer an overdose of muscle relaxants to end their life would be considered to have committed euthanasia. The arguments for euthanasia: 1.

BBC - Ethics - Euthanasia: Anti-euthanasia arguments

We need it - 'the compassion argument'. Supporters of euthanasia believe that allowing people to ‘die with dignity’ is kinder than forcing them to . Arguments against euthanasia Please note that we include assisted suicide or "medical aid in dying" when we use the word "euthanasia" in this document.

Euthanasia is a . Part 1. Arguments for voluntary euthanasia Rights of individuals in a democracy. 1. John Stuart Mill, one of the architects of democratic doctrine, advanced the principle that ‘the only purpose for which power can be rightly exercised over any member of a civilised community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others.

Arguments For And Against Euthanasia Essay Words 8 Pages Euthanasia is the practice of ending an individual's life in order to relieve them from an incurable disease or unbearable suffering.

Reasons for Euthanasia