Although a superficial inspection reveals that scandals could be effective regarding that, it could bring about the reduction of corruptions and bribes in a society, as far as I am concerned it could not be efficacious in one way or another. To begin with, I would affirm that scandals could thrust the politicians and higher-ups in the top of the organizational chart through the low-level subordinates, abstain from giving bribes. In other words, it may occasion to dwindle the rate of corporate corruption to a high degree. For example, think about a society that has free media.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. One must excuse my ambivalence on this issue as I see no argument for one stance or the other.
Scandals can serve to illuminate certain ignoble practices and also take the form of a red herring. Perhaps the reader of this essay will forgive me once I explain my viewpoint. Bridgegate, a scandal involving traffic jams in New Jersey, is a recent example.
The Watergate scandal was important not only because it exposed shady practices of the Nixon campaign but also because it showed how the concealment of information is necessary for government workers. This part of the Watergate story shed light on governmental conspiracy and the risk informants take.
Consequently, the wheels started turning in the movement to promote governmental transparency. In the end, the Watergate scandal helped to bring about positive change for American society. The Watergate example is not typical, however.
Some scandals bring nothing positive to the table.
These scandals may actually be deleterious to society. During the early years of the War on Terror, when American troops were loosing their lives in Iraq and Afghanistan, a certain celebrity got married in Las Vegas.
The marriage, itself, did not seem to hurt anyone outside the nuptial party.
Many people saw it as an affront to traditional values, however. This lack of awareness provided no positive consequences, unlike the Watergate scandal. These two example provide contrary arguments for the value of scandals. What is a person to do to resolve the dispute?
This is where the individual has the most strength. Each person must make up their own mind as to whether a scandal is merely a distraction or an exposure of unseemly practices.
True, humans tend to err, but this is the best solution to a complicated problem. Perhaps now my ambivalence seems justified. I do not believe that all scandals can be inherently good or evil.
The following appeared as a letter to the editor from a Central Plaza store owner. Many Central Plaza store owners believe that the decrease in their business is due to the number of skateboard users in the plaza. There has also been a dramatic increase in the amount of litter and vandalism throughout the plaza.
Thus, we recommend that the city prohibit skateboarding in Central Plaza. If skateboarding is prohibited here, we predict that business in Central Plaza will return to its previously high levels.
Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation. Skateboarders have gotten the short end of the stick for generations. However, one cannot assume that someone who skateboards has these negative attributes. This letter to the editor is a prime example of such discrimination.
Yet, the assumptions that the letter makes does little to prove that skateboarders in the area live up to their ignoble reputation.
The letter assumes that the only thing to have changed before and after the decline of Central Plaza is the presence of skaters.
Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could. Submitted by divyachobey on Mon, 08/27/ - Hence, should be . Select rating Give Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could. The essay stays focused and progresses thesis statement for gay marriage paper with no break. Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could. % %. 34 Claim: Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive. Issue Topic Pool - rutadeltambor.com
However, many other factors could be at play. For example, the local economy could be in recession.Indonesia Ivanhoe greeting and prayer request from Fr Lasbert 7 September Former Ivanhoe Parish priest-in-residence Fr Lasbert has written from his Indonesian parish to "all my friends in Ivanhoe Parish" saying how much he happily remembers us each week when he reads our parish news, adding that "It inspires me too, when I make homily .
The EPA’s decision conflicts with a March report from the International Agency for Research on Cancer that found that glyphosate “probably” contributes to non-Hodgkin lymphoma in humans and classified it as a ‘Group 2A’ carcinogen.
The article you have been looking for has expired and is not longer available on our system. This is due to newswire licensing terms. A mental health history including asylum and community care periods, with links to Andrew Roberts' book on the Lunacy Commission and other mental health writings, and the asylums index and word rutadeltambor.comd on England and Wales, it reaches out to the rest of the world with links to the general timeline of science and society, America .
The Indian Premier League (IPL) is a professional league for Twenty20 cricket championship in India.
It was initiated by the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI), headquartered in Mumbai,Maharashtra and is supervised by BCCI Vice President Rajeev Shukla, who serves as the league's Chairman and Commissioner.
Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could. Pros: Raise public awareness- perhaps not focus attention, but bring into the public eye, because they are more easily accessible and frequently accessed.